$Account.OrganizationName
News, Advice & Insight About Executive & Organizational Development
From WJM Associates, Inc.
May-June 2006 - Vol. 5 Issue 3

In This Issue  

Welcome to WJManagement Advisor, a bi-monthly newsletter about executive and organizational development from WJM Associates, Inc., a leading human resources management consulting firm. Delivered via e-mail and archived on our Web site www.wjmassoc.com, WJManagement Advisor presents issues and trends affecting the successful development of organizational leadership as well as strategies for executive career growth.

We hope you find WJManagement Advisor useful and welcome your comments. Send comments to our editor Tim Morin at tmorin@wjmassoc.com.

Venture Capitalists Turn to Executive Assessment
 
By Tim Morin
Tim Morin

During the technology boom of the late 1990s, venture capital funds and other private equity investors could count on the bull market for public stock offerings to help them extract quick and large profits from even poorly managed portfolio companies. However, today’s tougher (or more “sane”) market conditions for IPOs and mergers have resulted in a decline, or at least a delay, in exit opportunities for these investors. For example, in 1998, venture- backed companies took an average of 3 years to go public. In 2005, it took 5 years to complete a listing. This means private equity investors are more dependent than ever on their portfolio company management teams to build for the long- term.

These investors are not just relying on these managers for longer stretches of time, but they are also counting on them to steer the company through more stages of growth and change. These investors can no longer rely on inexperienced or poorly suited executives to quickly pull off a sale or IPO. During the bubble, venture capitalists emphasized new technologies and Internet business models, while today, not also taking into account quality of leadership could be a recipe for disaster.

Making a bad hiring or investment decision around management, whether it’s for a start-up or a multi- billion dollar buyout, leads to millions of dollars in losses. When you take into account vested management options or stock, severance costs and executive search expenses, not to mention the loss of morale, momentum and growth opportunities for the company, poor decisions about company leadership can be deadly.

Of course, if asked, most private equity investors would say that the quality of the management team is a critical factor when evaluating an opportunity – and poor management is most often the reason cited when expected investment returns fail to materialize. Yet, ironically, many private equity investors spend less time analyzing management as part of formal due diligence than on other issues. Why? Probably because it’s time consuming and they believe reliable metrics are hard to come by. Also, while comfortable analyzing balance sheets and market shares, these bankers often find human capital issues rather “soft”. As a result, private equity professionals rely largely on routine background checks and gut instincts in assessing executives.

However, sophisticated investors are increasingly discovering fast, convenient and more rigorous options for assessing portfolio company leadership. Administered by a skilled organizational psychologist, a pre-investment evaluation using 360 interviews, a Strengths Assessment and other validated personality tests can be a powerful tool for investigating an executive’s:

  • Capability to successfully lead the company during transition to a new configuration (small private enterprise to larger public company, division of large organization to stand alone company, pre- to post-merger, etc.)
  • Cultural fit – both within the portfolio company and in partnering with the investor firm
  • Interpersonal adaptability and openness to consultation and advice
  • Sensitivities to ethics, laws, and regulations
  • Communication skills and style
  • Vision capability
  • Personality

In addition to being an invaluable component of a thorough due diligence process, this type of pre-investment assessment provides the equity firm with a clear understanding of the development needs of key personnel prior to investing or purchasing and allows the investor to build these needs into performance parameters from the start.

Tim Morin is Chief Financial and Marketing Officer for WJM Associates. Prior to joining WJM, Tim served as Vice President at Prudential Securities' investment bank, where he executed private equity transactions for media and technology companies.


Are These Key Elements In Your Succession Plan
 
By Marilyn Blocker
Marilyn Blocker

Succession planning used to be something reserved for senior management. In recent years, however, more and more organizations have expanded the process to include greater numbers of positions and people as they look to leverage human capital to sustain competitive advantage.

Succession plans run the spectrum, from simple to complex, depending upon whether they capture a small population or a global talent pool. Plans are sometimes piecemeal, focusing only on specific divisions or operating units, but they can also be organization-wide. Even the most elementary succession plans are good, proactive measures for identifying back-up candidates for key positions and ensuring that they are appropriately developed.

What goes into a successful succession plan? Here are the key elements that many established organizations include in their succession plans:

Key position identification.
Critical positions that require immediate and future backup are considered “key positions.” Many organizations create a database of middle- to senior-level management positions and individual contributor roles where market demand is high and supply is limited. The database should reflect both short-term and long-term organizational needs.

High-potential employees.
These are employees identified in anticipation of filling key roles in the long-term. The organization's pool of high- potential employees should prescribe development within a broad range of disciplines, such as finance and accounting, operations, and marketing. Organizations need to identify multiple high-potential employees for each key position, given anticipated attrition in a time period that exceeds three-to-five years.

Future replacements.
Experienced employees who can be developed in three-to- five years are considered future replacements. Each key position should have multiple employees designated for future replacements, given attrition that could occur within that timeframe.

Ready replacements.
These are employees and managers capable of filling key positions immediately. An effective succession plan identifies each key position and ensures a minimum of one ready replacement, but preferably two to three.

"At-risk" employees.
Oftentimes, organizations lose employees who are in high demand and who also have less than five years of service with the organization. Such “at risk” employees require frequent monitoring to ensure that performance reviews are timely and development efforts take place as scheduled.

Retiring employees.
More and more people are retiring early these days. Employees and managers who are within five years of normal retirement should be monitored for such plans.

Marginally performing employees.
These are people who need further development, more suitable roles within the organization, or outplacement. They should be identified because they often block the progression of high-potential employees and others designated for future replacement.

Diverse employees.
This class includes women and employees of various races and ethnicities who have been identified as ready replacements or high-potential employees. It is important for succession plans to identify such individuals not only for the purposes of equal employment opportunity or affirmative action documentation, but also to address a segment of the workforce that typically has special development needs or faces unique organizational challenges.

International employees.
These are employees designated for international assignments who may have special development needs, including cross-cultural coaching and specialized training in language proficiency. Most multinational organizations today have established pools of employees for potential international roles and maintain a record of various languages spoken or read, as well as corresponding levels of proficiency.

Key position replacement status and gap analysis .
This portion of a succession plan identifies areas of vulnerability and provides the foundation for development plans for both future replacements and high-potential employees. It is critically important to construct detailed development plans as a basis for comprehensive analysis that will narrow the gap between key positions and designated replacements for both short- and long-term needs.

Development plans.
These bridge gaps in position requirements and existing skill sets of designated employees and managers. Organizations should manage succession planning just as they manage other key business processes – with plans that contain goals and objectives, measurement standards and metrics, and a process for periodic monitoring.

Knowing that good planning is essential to effective asset management, leading organizations typically manage succession plans the same way that they manage their strategic and operating plans – by frequently assessing progress and adjusting to changing priorities as needed.

In a knowledge-based economy, it is more important than ever to continuously respond to changing market conditions as a way of protecting both hard and soft assets. Organizations that view human capital as one of their few sustainable assets in today's highly competitive economy are considerably ahead of the curve and on the way to becoming employers of choice – if they aren't already.

Marilyn Blocker is a member of WJM Associates' executive coaching and organizational effectiveness faculty. Drawing upon over 20 years of experience with leading Fortune 500 and healthcare organizations, she specializes in coaching, succession planning, and large-scale organizational change associated with turnaround, consolidation, restructuring, and M & A integration.


WJM Associates Celebrates its 10th Year Anniversary
 

It’s hard to believe that it’s been 10 years since we started WJM in May 1996. All of us here at WJM are so grateful to have had the privilege of working with so many of the world’s leading companies over the past decade. It has truly been an honor to contribute to the success of, and to learn from these top practitioners of leadership development. We are also thankful of our 100+ thought leaders who make up our Faculty, whose collective experience and wisdom have been so instrumental to our success. We look forward to many more decades of learnings and sharings around maximizing human potential.


William J. Morin



Headquartered in New York City, WJM Associates is a recognized leader in the fields of executive and organizational development. WJM has a Faculty of over 100 experienced executive coaches and consultants delivering coaching, assessment and other organizational effectiveness services throughout the world. To learn how we can help you, visit www.wjmassoc.com, contact one of our account managers toll free at 1-877-667-4647 or e- mail us at tmorin@wjmassoc.com.

Sincerely,


Tim Morin
WJM Associates Inc